I see merit in allocating
20% of employee time on anything they want. As it might lead to
optimization, innovation. We often get busy following existing defined
processes that we do not consider optimizing it or changing it. I think, having
20% time allocated to do whatever employees want will provide employees to
think over processes they follow. Or design something new and come up with some
concepts which might work better.
Saying that I also think to give 20% time to every employee in the company will increase costs. And might not
be effective. There are some positions such as customer service
representatives, if they get 20% to do whatever they like, that time will have
to be covered by a different person that might increase the employee expense
for the organization without adding much value.
Likewise, in factories
also, I think it might increase the employee cost, as management needs to hire
more people who will work to cover the people who chose not to work during
their 20% off the time. It is not really off time, but the time when they can do
something else.
For the engineer working
in the projects, who usually have deadlines to meet, they usually get a lot of
work was done near the deadline, I am not sure if giving them 20% time to do
whatever they like would result in anything other than their project work.
Otherwise, there will be a cost involved, as it would take 20% more time than it
would have to take otherwise. There is one way of handling the impact on time while estimating the manager could factor in the 20% time employees would get
when they can do whatever they would like to do. Or if the cannot take the
extra 20% time, then they can hire more people.
That way, there will not be any impact on the delivery timeline, but there
is no way to avoid additional costs. Otherwise, the quality of the project might
get impacted negatively due to lack of time.
I completely understand
the water cooler effect and I think personal rapport is great (Bergstein,2014).
And being physically near each other helps with that rapport building. But if an organization demands to be at work every day regardless of whether then that
might be a problem. In blue-collar jobs or customer-facing jobs that might be
the only way. But considering the snow and other weather situations, organizations should allow employees to work remotely.
I work in IT services
company. And we have onshore and offshore teams. In my current project, we have
people all over. Some are in different time zones in the USA, some are in
Europe and some are in Asia. We have a big chunk of the team in Boston. I feel the
rapport is far better when we are collocated. And if there are cultural
differences physical differences can magnify those differences. That way the
water cooler effect helps to understand each other. And I have some experience
of working remote. Last year in 2018 I spent a major part of it working from
home. And it has some downsides, while I had regular meetings with the team but I
definitely dealt with loneliness and lack of human interaction (Pinola,2017).
References –
Bergstein, B. (2014).
Google Execs Have Ideas on How to Run Your Business. MIT Technology
Review. Retrieved from: http://www.technologyreview.com/news/531056/google-execs-have-ideas-on-how-to-run-your-business/
Pinola, M ( March,2017).
The 7 Biggest Remote Work Challenges (and How to Overcome Them). Retrieved from
https://zapier.com/blog/remote-work-challenges/
.
Comments
Post a Comment