Skip to main content

• What are the keys to evaluating the success of a project?

At the end of the project, there are few parameters the project team has to meet –

1.     Successfully contract closure – essentially delivering what was promising

2.     Releasing a project team – reallocating team members to new projects

3.     Final payment – receiving or making the final payment based on the role

4.     Post project evaluation or lessons learned – understand what could be improved and taking the knowledge forward for future projects

5.     Trust and alignment effectiveness – management evaluates the role of trust or result of lack of it and tries to understand what could have been done better.

6.     Schedule and budget management review of schedule and budget is done and areas of improvements are identified

7.     Risk mitigation – before the start of the project risks are identified, and the end of the project there needs to be a review of the risks which were identified and if anything was missed and how did the mitigation process work out.

8.     Procurement contracts – performance of suppliers and vendors are reviewed to determine if their contracts would be renewed

9.     Customer satisfaction – is very important and meeting customers’ expectations are just one part of it, there are many more components such as communication etc which plays an important role to meet customer satisfaction goals.

10.  Senior management – receives all the information sent to stakeholders regarding the project

11.  Archiving documents – All project-related documents are usually stored in a safe place, for future reference.

The project team has to successfully complete each step of these or whatever is applicable among these (Watt,2014).  

 

I think they did articulate the lessons learned. The teams captured what went well and why did those things go well. And as we see these can be applied to other similar projects, so these are transferrable. For example, the staff at one project, on the creation of smoke-free hospitals, reported that after they evaluated their project, they found that 595 indoor-smoking areas were removed during the first year of the project. Consequently, they used this positive outcome to reinforce efforts to make the hospitals smoke-free as well as to encourage other hospitals to implement such policies (Stillman & Spires, 2014).

 


The multidimensional Global Health partnership program the index was developed to assess the grantees and the feedback was provided by the program managers and mentors. The pro is the program manager and mentors had firsthand information and a better understanding of the process and outcome, so they would be able to judge better.

But if the judges are not the same people then the judgment might vary as all the success parameters are subjective and might vary based on the person.

I would have preferred quantitative type data where it would have easier to precisely understand who is better. For example, if something is good, it is better to know how good that thing is. And good/bad or any other qualitative parameter can vary based on the person's perspective, and these are not precise. That is why I would prefer quantitative measures, especially because hear success means securing financial support.

 

 

I do not see any problem in sharing the results with all grantees. The goals of these projects were primarily cancer and tobacco control projects. And if the end of the day sharing information helps the other teams to do something to stop cancer or stop people from smoking, that should be encouraged. And moreover understanding how technical assistance can contribute to their project, can and will help them better utilize the assistance.

I think the findings can be shared with other programs too, especially if those are health-related too, that way other can learn and adapt from these. My point is simple, these programs should help humanity to solve problems like cancer and should not be about coming up with a solution and generating profit. So, all these findings should be open-sourced so that anyone can benefit from these and better utilize the resources for better outcomes.

 

 

 

References -

Stillman, F. & Spires, M. (2014). Improving Successful Project Completion: Lessons Learned from the Global Health Partnerships Program. Health Affairs Blog.  Retrieved from: http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2014/02/24/improving-successful-project-completion-lessons-learned-from-the-global-health-partnerships-program/

Watt, A. (2014). Project Management. BCcampus Open Textbook project. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Question and Answer

      * These attacks consist of injecting malicious client-side scripts into a website and using the website as a propagation method is: These attacks consist of injecting malicious client-side scripts into a website and using the website as a propagation method is: XML External Entities Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Security Mis Configuration Injection * A security principle, that ensures that authority is not circumvented in subsequent requests of an object by a subject, by checking for authorization (rights and privileges) upon every request for the object is ____.   A security principle, that ensures that authority is not circumvented in subsequent requests of an object by a subject, by checking for authorization (rights a Complete Mediation Least Privileges Separation of Duties Weakest Link * Unprotected files
Post a Comment
Read more

What are the challenges Zara face to maintain it's growth?

Notably, Zara has a unique approach to handle changing demand, which has allowed the company to become widely successful and a leading business organization in the fashion retail industry, in which many corporations struggle to deal with fast-changing environments, operations, and inventory costs. The arrival of new trends forces retailers to adapt their collections, causing what James (2011) calls the Forrester or bullwhip effect. Zara relies heavily on outsourced manufacturing, even though most operations and inventory decisions and strategies are still held, taken, and based out on their headquarters in Spain. Every time an order is placed, all items are shipped to Spain for final design adjustments and inventory stocking. With the use of technology and collaboration with its store managers, the company can produce only what is currently trending, which results in a significant reduction of unsold items caused by the rapidly changing tastes of consumers in this fast-changing ind
Post a Comment
Read more

How Toyota New Global Architecture (TNGA) revolutionize the automobile manufacturing industry?

Toyota New Global Architecture (TNGA) system was created to revolutionize the actual automobile manufacturing systems. TNGA aims to promote a massive transformation in Toyota's development processes by emphasizing in harmony between planning and design, which, when appropriately combined and managed, will increase the company’s efficiency (N.A., 2015). Toyota's TNGA system is revolutionary because it creates an even leaner way of designing and manufacturing its cars and establishes a new era of vehicle design and production. From a different perspective, TNGA is a revolutionary system not because it employs a modular approach; since companies like Nissan and Volkswagen already use modular systems in their production plants (Schmitt, 2015). It is revolutionary because it is disruptive and expands the traditional and legendary Toyota’s lean methodology to a different level (N.A., 2015). This new global architecture system is disruptive to the old Toyota Production System (T
1 comment
Read more